Key Requirements

• Summarise both texts
• Evaluate the arguments
• Give your own opinion
• Use formal register
• Write 220-260 words
• Organise into 4 paragraphs
• Include a conclusion

Example Introduction

"The role of homework in education has been widely debated in recent years. While some argue that traditional homework is essential for reinforcing learning, others believe it should be replaced with more engaging project-based assignments."

Example Body Paragraph

"Proponents of traditional homework maintain that it reinforces classroom learning and helps students develop self-discipline. They claim that regular assignments improve exam performance and teach time management skills. While this argument has some merit, it overlooks the fact that not all students benefit equally from written tasks."

Example Body Paragraph

"On the other hand, advocates for project-based learning argue that real-world tasks promote deeper understanding and creativity. They suggest that collaborative projects better prepare students for modern workplaces. This perspective is compelling, particularly given the growing emphasis on soft skills in today's job market."

Example Conclusion

"In my view, the most effective approach would combine both methods. A balanced system that includes targeted homework for core subjects alongside project-based tasks would cater to different learning styles and provide students with a more comprehensive education."

Sample Question: Should university education be free for all students?

Text A argues that free university education is a fundamental right and essential for social equality. Text B argues that free education places an unsustainable burden on taxpayers and devalues degrees.

The Affordability of University Education

The question of whether university education should be free is a matter of considerable debate. On the one hand, there are compelling arguments in favour of free access, while on the other, concerns about feasibility and quality cannot be ignored.

Supporters of free education contend that access to higher learning is a fundamental right that should not depend on financial means. They argue that tuition-free universities promote social mobility and reduce inequality. While this perspective is admirable, it underestimates the significant costs involved and the administrative challenges of implementing such a system.

Critics, however, maintain that free education places an excessive financial burden on the state, ultimately requiring higher taxes or cuts to other essential services. They also suggest that when education is free, degrees may become devalued and student motivation could decline. This concern is worth considering, particularly in light of overcrowded universities in countries with free education models.

In my view, a compromise would be the most viable solution. Means-tested tuition fees, combined with generous scholarships for disadvantaged students, could strike a balance between accessibility and sustainability. This approach would ensure that financial barriers are reduced without compromising the quality or value of higher education.

(248 words)